It goes without saying, but iron ore demand is all about the steel
industry, writes Michael King. Total world steel production last year
according to the World Steel Association (worldsteel) was 1,413.5mt
(million tonnes), up from 1,230.9mt a year earlier. worldsteel forecasts
that steel use will increase by 5.9% to 1,359mt in 2011, following
13.2% growth in 2010, before reaching a new record of 1,441 in 2012.
But while demand for steel is healthily expanding, this growth is not
evenly spread. Even by next year steel use in the developed world is not
expected to have returned to 2007 levels. But in the emerging and
developing economies demand in 2012 will be 38% above pre-global
financial crisis 2007. Indeed, by 2012 emerging and developing economies
will account for 72% of world steel demand.
Rising demand for steel is reflected in forecasts for iron ore movements
by sea. According to the latest Asia Shipping Pulse produced by
Macquarie Research, seaborne dry bulk movements of iron ore increased
11.1% in 2010 to 1,042mt. This total is estimated to reach 1,089mt this
year.
The minimal year-on-year growth forecast for 2011 is linked to supply
side disruptions caused in most cases by adverse weather. This prompted
Macquarie to downgrade demand growth to 4.5% year-on-year in its June
figures from 7.4% previously, but this lag in supply relative to demand
will be clawed back in subsequent years when growth rates for ocean-
going iron ore trade accelerate once more. In 2012 iron ore trade by sea
is expected to reach 1,157mt and then climb againto 1,245mt in 2013. Another factor which has impacted trade this year was the
earthquake and tsunami which devastated parts of Japan on 11 March. However, according to the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (Abares), Japan’s imports will remain steady at around 133mt this year despite reduced iron ore imports and steel production in March and April. Higher steel output in the second half of the year is forecast to keep its momentum through 2012 when iron ore imports are predicted to climb by 12% to 149mt, more than offsetting the demand growth lull of early 2011.
Elsewhere, the European Union and the Republic of Korea are forecast to import 8% and 9% more iron ore this year compared to 2010, pushing volumes to 145mt and 57mt, respectively. The EU is then expected to increase imports by 6% in 2012 to 154mt, with Korean demand rising at a similar pace to total 60mt.
However it is China, as has been the case for much of the last decade, which remains the key market driver for ocean- borne iron ore movements. China’s steel use in 2011 is expected to increase by 5% to 605mt following 5.1% growth in 2010, although worldsteel admits demand growth could be higher.
In terms of iron ore demand, this will translate into seaborne purchases of 642m tonne this year, up 3% compared to 2010 “The slower growth in imports compared with the annual average of 18% in the previous five years reflects increased domestic production, which has become more competitive as world prices increased,” said Abares.
“However, iron ore consumption is forecast to remain higher than domestic production and hence imports will continue to grow.”
Despite the relative slowdown, China’s meagre increase — at least compared to the double-digit growth witnessed in previous years — will still represent the largest increase in demand in 2011 by any country. In 2012 demand is forecast to rise by 8% to almost 700mt as consumption increases continue to outpace growth in domestic production, although this comes with the caveat that if iron ore prices are high, domestic production will spike and shave back import numbers.
The global increase in demand for iron ore and the supply chain disruption that curtailed some supply sources early in 2011 has been a leading cause of the price hikes witnessed this year. Spot prices for iron ore in real terms reached a new record in the first quarter of this year, aided by flooding and storms in Western Australia. This led in turn to quarterly contract prices in June reaching US$172 a tonne, 25% higher than the previous quarter.
Abares expects contract prices to ease as the year progresses, averaging around US$159 per tonne in the second half of the year and then falling again to lower than $150 per tonne during 2012 as output from Brazil and Australia is
boosted, although this will be offset to some degree by lower Indian exports which are expected to decrease because of a rise in export taxes.
The anticipated surge in iron ore trade the second half of this year was already apparent at the start of the third quarter, as it emerged that the number of Capesize bulk carriers calling at Australian and Brazilian load ports was rising, although the huge surplus of tonnage was still not offering owners much in the way of freight rate succour, particularly with over 200 more Capesize vessels of over 120,000dwt due for delivery by the end of the year.
In 2011,Australian exports of iron ore are forecast to increase by 3% to 414mt, according to Abares. As previously reported (see ‘Australia regional report: coastal freight rates threaten domestic shipping,’ starting on p89 of the July 2011 issue of DCI),Australian mineral output forecasts for exports have been overly optimistic in recent years with numerous infrastructure developments falling behind schedule.
Abares is now confident that a significant number of expansions will come on stream over the next 18 months, however. The government analyst lists Fortescue Metal Group’s Chichester Hub (15mt/year) and the start of production at Mount Gibson Iron’s Extension Hill project as major additional contributors this year. Existing mines are also expected to ramp up output.
“Australia’s exports of iron ore in 2012 are forecast to increase by 11% to 459mt, underpinned by increased production from projects scheduled for completion in the second half of 2011,” said Abares. “These projects include CITIC Pacific’s Sino Iron Project (28mt) and BHP Billiton’s Western Australian Iron Ore Rapid Growth Project 5.
“Brazil’s exports are forecast to increase by 5% in 2011 and by a further 10% in 2012 to reach 358mt. Growth in Brazil’s exports will be underpinned by strong import demand from China, Japan and the European Union.”
India is the biggest question mark in most iron ore supply forecasts. Earlier this year the export ban in place since July 2010 in the state of Karnataka to prevent illegal mining was lifted. This had been a key reason why India’s exports fell by 8% to 89mt in 2010. But although the ban will increase supply, a nationwide 20% export duty on iron ore export sales could dampen the impact. Whether supplies from India will be attractive to Chinese buyers with the additional tax burden remained to be seen as DCI went to press.
China becomes world’s main driver of minerals and metals demand
At 626.7mt (million tonnes), China in 2010 had a share of 44.3% of the world crude steel production, writes Kunal Bose. In the first four months of this year, China alone accounted for nearly 230mt of world steel output of close to 500mt. The world has watched in wonder as China became the principal driver of global demand for minerals and metals. In 2010, China alone constituted as much as 59% of global seaborne trade in iron ore, the principal raw material for making steel through the basic oxygen furnace (BOF) route. It is no wonder then that Chinese moves like rebuilding and drawing down of inventories leave an impact on the iron ore market. Leading iron ore producers all the time are trying to figure out to what extent China in the long run will be seeking self-reliance in iron ore, the biggest dry bulk commodity in the minerals space.
There is no love lost between China and the principal producer exporters of iron ore. To start with, Beijing was
resentful that instead of China, the world’s biggest consumer of the mineral, it would be Japan to negotiate the annual prices of iron ore with the Brazilian miner Vale and Anglo-Australian groups BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto. While the triumvirate took notice of that more recently, what left China infuriated was last year’s decision by major suppliers of iron ore to what appeared to be arbitrary dispensing with the decades old annual pricing system for quarterly price contracts. Besides China, the world’s largest steel producing group ArcelorMittal and many others thought the new price regime would result in their iron ore bill going up. That has come true.
Miners are now making further migration to monthly contracts which, according to them, will more faithfully reflect the spot prices. The monthly contract prices are primarily based on indexes made available by agencies like Platts, Metal Bulletin, CRU and Steel Index. That the miners are in a position to dictate terms is a fact of life. For however more aggressive China may become to build iron ore mining capacity within the country and acquire mining rights independently or through joint ventures or through minority participation in foreign countries, it will not be able to do without imports at any point in future. What China is aiming at is to bring down the share of imports in the growing total use of the mineral.
A BHP Billiton paper says the world steel production from a base of 1.414bn tonnes in 2010 should be growing at a CAGR of 3.7% to 2.446bn tonnes in 2025 and during this period China will have an incremental production of 485mt. A report emanating from China says as a result of the mining initiatives in full flow, the country’s iron ore production is to climb to 1.5bn tonnes by 2015 from 1.1bn tonnes last year. But since China has to live with ore poor in iron (Fe) content, post washing and quality upgradation, the country will have indigenous supply of finished ore of 760mt in 2015 when its steel industry’s demand for the mineral will be about 1.3bn tonnes. Big imports, therefore will still be unavoidable. But the important thing is China’s import dependence on ore then will be down to 42% of total requirements from a high of 63% in 2010.
The Chinese posturing and future planning with a sense of urgency have no doubt been triggered by the uncompromising stand of the big miners to dispense with yearly contracts. As quarterly contracts became the order of the day, Chinese steel mills like their counterparts elsewhere had to bear the brunt of a 61% rise in iron ore price to $145 a tonne in 2010. Iron ore imports by China last year fell 1.4% to 619mt. But the new pricing system and the fact of commodity cycle drove the ore rates so high that China ended up picking an extra import bill of $30bn last year. This, according to the Chinese ministry of industry and Information Technology, was largely responsible for squeezing the steel industry’s margins to 2.9% in 2010 from 7.3% in 2007. In fact, raw materials costs climbed so high that steel turned into one of the worst performing industries in China where the average profit margin for industrial companies was 6.2% last year.
Besides what is being done to step up mining within the country, China has come to believe that there will be moderation in iron ore prices in future years as big ticket investments in opening new mines and expanding many of the operating mines come to fruition. An official of the China Mining Association says,“surging prices of iron ore since 2003 has attracted a huge amount of investment in the sector and there will soon be a concentrated release of capacity breaking the monopoly a few big hold.” Incidentally, the big three in the business account for two-thirds of global supply of iron ore.
The Chinese official further says the global iron ore reserve is so rich and so widely spread that the requirements of the steel industry could easily be met for the next 100 years and more. BHP,Vale and Rio have ownership of some high quality ore and with huge surplus funds at their disposal, they will always remain in the prowl for virgin deposits. “But they don’t have all of world resources. China will be less and less dependent on them as it steps up its own production and diversifies its iron ore procurement points,” the official points out. The likes of Vale and BHP cannot but take serious note of the Chinese long-term plans.
In the meantime, China is employing resource diplomacy to the fullest to see that Africa becomes the world’s next iron ore frontier. For this to happen African countries endowed with iron ore deposits will have to have infrastructure for egress of the mineral from mines through roads and rail to ports for export
and political stability. China’s progress in getting access to all types of minerals and oil and gas resources in Africa has taken the western countries by surprise, if not shock. Analysts think this has been possible largely because China has dared to go to what are seen as ‘high risk’ countries in that continent with offer of building infrastructure on attractive terms.
Integrated service provider SMM Information and Technology says, “China is to increasingly turn to Africa to satisfy its iron ore needs as more Chinese companies look to invest or partner in mines. That Africa is destined to emerge as the next big supplier of industrial raw materials, including iron ore is underlined by the fact that while it accounts for some 20% of world resources, it hardly has a share of 2% of world trade.”
Hemant M Nerurkar, managing director of Tata Steel which bought the European Corus Group in January 2007, says the “easier sources of iron ore are now more or less depleted or are already in use. So the next sources are going to be a little more difficult as these will be further in the hinterland and will, therefore, have logistic and port issues. These issues are required to be tackled before the next round of sources starts yielding iron ore.” China understood the challenges inherent in acquiring iron ore or any other mineral assets in foreign shores ahead of others.
In Nerurkar’s observation “in the long run, iron ore will globally be available in plenty and there will be no real shortages,” one finds confirmation of the Chinese belief that the price dictating power of a few groups will weaken over the years. In recent weeks, iron ore depending on its Fe content is selling in the range of $172 to $185 a tonne. This price range will not hold as new capacity comes on production stream.This should start happening in 2013. But at the same time Nerurkar says,“I don’t see prices of good old days returning. I don’t expect to see prices falling below $110 to $100 a tonne.” Some analysts think that the world is moving in the direction of an ‘oversupplied’ situation from what is now a ‘tight supply’ scene in the next couple of years, thanks to China and the rest of the world fast expanding their iron ore production. In a future oversupplied situation, competition among producers will see them giving increasing attention to product quality, cost and supply reliability. All this will work to the advantage of iron ore buyers.
The share of raw materials in the production cost of steel has risen so significantly in the last five years that major steel groups across the world are feeling the need for vertical integration of their operations from mining to making the metal. The migration to quarterly/monthly contracts has only added to the urgency of such integration. ArcelorMittal, Chinese steelmakers singly or jointly and Tata Steel for its European plants will remain in iron ore asset hunt. One important reason why ArcelorMittal or South Korean Pohang Steel is keen to build steel mills in India is because of government assurances of giving linkages to iron ore mines.
Even local groups like Steel Authority of India,Tata Steel, JSW and Essar have made preferential allotment of iron ore deposits to them a precondition for creating new steelmaking capacity. At the same time, the coast-based mills in India have seen merits in scouting for assets in places like Australia and Indonesia. After all moving iron ore from hinterland states Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand to coastal points in Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu, both big markets for steel, by rail costs more than getting the material by ships from foreign countries like Australia and Indonesia. An industry official says India owning iron ore deposits of an estimated 25bn tonnes does not mean its steelmakers should not attempt buying assets abroad.
Ore production in Brazil set to double to 800mt in the next five to six years
If all goes according to plan, Brazil will be mining almost 800mt (million tonnes) of iron ore in 2015, twice the 390mt to be produced this year, writes Patrick Knight.
Vale, now responsible for 83% of the 330mt to be exported this year, expects to produce 150mt more in 2015 than the 300mt it will mine this year. A total of 130mt of this will come from existing mine in the Carajas
complex, from where ore was first exported in 1985, but a new mine, ‘Serra Sul’, the largest in the world, will be producing 90mt a year by then. The rest will come from mines in Minas Gerais.
In addition to the extra ore from Vale, nine new mines, most owned by Brazilian companies — the majority of them steel companies, but also including companies from China, Kazakhstan, and the Anglo-American company — should between them produce about 300mt in 2015.
Most of the extra will come from mines in Minas Gerais state, and will leave from the Tubarao port complex in Espirito Santo. Tubarao is being upgraded to allow a new generation of 400,000dwt-capacity ships now being built in China and South Korea for Vale, to load there. Some of the ore from mines in Minas Gerais will leave from the Guaiba/Sepetiba complex in Rio de Janeiro state.
Ore from the MMX companies Serra Azul mine, anticipated to be producing 25mt a year by 2015 will leave via the nearly completed Acu port, in the north of Rio de Janeiro state.
Two companies plan to open mines in Bahia state, where the iron content of ores is considerably lower than the 67% of that mined in Para and Minas Gerais states.
But with supplies of high iron content ore becoming short as many mines containing such ore in Australia and elsewhere are nearing exhaustion, lower quality ores which cost much less are increasingly acceptable.
As well as the extra to come from the Carajas complex,Vale is to start exporting some of the tens of millions tonnes of lower iron content ore which has been stored in mines in Minas Gerais state for decades, and which the present high prices make attractive to sell.
In addition to the extra capacity at Carajas, Samarco, owned jointly by Vale and BHP Billiton, plans to build a third pipeline to take slurry from its mines to the port of Ubu. Additional pelletization facilities are planned either at Ubu, or adjacent to Samarco mines in Minas Gerais.
Ore from the new mines to be built in Bahia state may travel to the sea along the ‘East–West’ railway, now being constructed, or it may reach a port to be built near Ilheus, along a new slurry pipeline.
Whether all this planned new capacity, expected to cost not less than $50 billions, in fact materializes, depends on how fast demand grows and how long prices remain a their present highs. Views on this differ greatly.
Brazil’s ore exports, half now going to China, earned companies $29 billions in 2010, 15% of Brazil’s entire export earnings. This was three times the share of export earnings which ore formed a decade ago.
The high export earnings from ore have ensured that despite a flood of extra imports stimulated by the strength of the currency, Brazil’s trade balance did not slip into the red last year,
as had been feared. The export of about 350mt of ore this year is expected to
earn $36–40 billion dollars, as ore now costs 55% more than at this time last year.
The amount sold to China has increased from 10mt in 1999, to 150mt last year.
The big question is, how much longer will demand by China continue to grow fast and if it does, what proportion of the ore China will need, will be Brazilian?
Analysts point out that tens of millions of people are now migrating from the countryside to cities each year, not only in China, but also in India, now the worlds third largest ore exporter, which has been forced to slow ore exports to keep pace with
growing domestic demand. Big population movements are also taking place in many
countries in Asia and in Africa as well. Urbanization means that new railways, houses, ports, roads, bridges and other infrastructure will be needed to accommodate the migrants.
This encourages optimists to think that demand will remain strong and prices high for at least another 20 years.
Others suggest that because growth in China is likely to slow from its present 9–10% each year, prices will only remain as high as they are now for two or three more years.
In any case, demand should remain high enough to encourage most, if not all the new investments in new mines to be made, as all the companies are making almost indecent profits at the moment.
The high price of ore explains why all of Brazil’s steel companies are opening their own mines, and wherever possible, exporting a surplus. A few years ago, 70% of the ore used in Brazil was produced by Vale, but this proportion has now fallen to less than half, and will not exceed 30% in a few years’ time. Vale may have cause to regret this trend.
With grades falling in ore from all other origins, demand for high quality Brazilian ore, cheaper to process than any other, should continue strong. Despite its mines being further from most markets than those of its leading competitors.
With less ore being sold to countries in Europe each year, more is going to Asia.
This explains the enthusiasm of Vale for buying concessions to deposits in Guinea, several days’ less sailing time than from Brazil.Vale has invested $2.5 billion in Guinea so far.
Vale suffered badly five years ago when demand for ore was so strong that freight rates of the chartered ships it was using rose from the normal $10 per tonne, to more than $100 per tonne.
To ensure this never happens again,Vale has ordered 16 ships with 400,000-tonne capacity and is to take another 15 similar vessels, the largest which can enter most ports in China, on 25 year charter. Twenty years ago,Vale, or CVRD had a large fleet of ore carriers, but these have long been sold
The decision to have the ships built in yards in Asia, rather than in Brazil, was the main reason why Roger Agnelli,Vale chief executive for the past ten years, was pushed out early this year. Agnelli was sacked despite the fact that Vale’s sales increased tenfold while he was at the helm.
The left leaning and increasingly nationalistic government was incensed that Vale did not buy the ships it needs in Brazil. Even though such ships would have cost twice as much as those made in Asia and would not have been delivered on time.
When demand for ore slumped in 2009,Vale laid of several thousand workers, and this was also unacceptable to the government.
Although Vale was in theory privatized in 1997, most of its shares are still held by the pension funds of state-owned companies, which are strongly influenced by the government. The government also holds a ‘golden’ share, which it can use to ensure Vale is never sold to a foreign company.
These restrictions explain why Vale shares are worth considerably less than those of Rio Tinto and BHP Billiton, even though Vale’s long-term prospects may be better than those of its competitors.
In addition to new ships, a fourth pier is being built at the port of Itaqui to handle the new 400,000dwt vessels. Itaqui is the terminus of the 890km railway which brings ore from Carajas to the port and which now being duplicated to meet growing demand.
This will allow trains of 330 wagons, each carrying 40,000 tonnes of ore and 4km long, to move faster. A new 160km length of track is being built to the new mine, where ore will be taken from workings to processing plants by a network of conveyers, some up to 20km long, rather than by trucks.
Carajas Sul will be the first large mine in the world to go entirely ‘truckless’ which will cut costs and ensure CO2 emissions fall sharply.
While Brazil’s sales of ore to China have soared in the past ten years, those to virtually all the other customers, notably those in Europe, but to most Asian countries as well, have fallen, or at best remained stagnant.
Japan, for many years the leading customer for Brazilian ore, now takes 25% less than six years ago, while less is being sold to South Korea,Taiwan and the Philippines
Several important customers in Europe, such as Germany, France, Spain, Italy and Belgium, took between 20–40% less last year then in 2005.
On the other hand, more went to Bahrain and Saudi Arabia, while sales to the Netherlands have almost doubled in the past six years as well, and those going to Argentina have increased.