Since the IMO’s Ballast Water
Convention lays down strict discharge
standards, ballast water now shipped in
upper wing tanks must be treated before it
can be discharged. However, Marshall
points out that there is no technology
available today that can treat large volumes
of ballast water as it is taken on board
during and after cargo discharge whilst still
guaranteeing that ballast water discharge
standards will be met when the vessel
arrives at the load port, probably at the end
of a long voyage.
Marshall does not believe that the “re-
growth” issue has been properly addressed
either by the IMO or US Coast Guard type
approval processes. No treatment system
is completely effective, he argues, so
regrowth on longer voyages is inevitable.
This is supported by the overwhelming
body of scientific data. Therefore,
Coldharbour’s technology, optimized as it is
for the large long haul vessels, employs a
treatment process that takes place during a
part of the voyage, rather than during
uptake or discharge.
“The regrowth test for IMO is only five
days after treatment, whilst the much
vaunted USCG TA actually only tests for
one day! Some of these large bulkers have
ballast legs more than ten days and in
extremis as long as 42 days. Even if a
relatively small number of marine
organisms survive the initial treatment
process, they will have plenty of dead
organisms to feed on over a long ballast
voyage,” he commented. “If ballast water
fails to meet the discharge standard, there
will be delays and penalties, and possible
long-term reputational damage.
“That’s why we sat down to think about
the particular challenges faced by the
operators of these vessels, and we feel that
the Kormarine arena will provide an ideal
opportunity to talk about it. After all, most
large bulkers are built either in South Korea
or China, and Asia is the world’s largest
consumer of bulk cargoes, especially iron
ore.”
THE SHIP SCIENCE
Bulk carriers are designed and built
principally for the carriage of dry
commodities including iron ore, coal, grain,
phosphates and bauxite. The majority of
the fleet consists of ships in the so-called
“Handysize”, “Handymax” and “Supramax”
categories ranging from 30–60,000dwt.
However, on long-haul routes, Capesize
vessels and even larger very large ore
carriers are often deployed to move large volumes of dense cargoes, including iron
ore and coal.
For these vessels, ballast water plays an
essential role in their safe operation when
they are not loaded. This is because ballast
water is vital in ensuring a ship’s stability
and ultimately guaranteeing the safety of
her structure and her crew. Large volumes
are required to ensure hydrodynamic
efficiency and full propeller immersion.
Iron ore is the single largest dry bulk cargo. It is very dense at approximately 2.5
tonnes/m3 and relatively small volumes
soon take a ship down to her maximum
permissible draught. Alternate hold loading
is frequently used as a technique to
minimize longitudinal stress on a bulk
carrier’s hull girder, but when a vessel is not
loaded, huge volumes of ballast are required
for safe operation.
Satisfactory stability is essential in
ensuring that a ship rights itself as it rolls in
a seaway but it must be carefully controlled
to prevent cargo shifting in the holds and excessive accelerations which cause
discomfort for passengers and crew. A
ship’s GM, or metacentric height as it is
known — the distance between its vertical
centre of gravity and its metacentre — is
the key element in making sure that a ship
is stable. For this, a positive GM is required
— in other words, a vessel’s centre of
gravity must always lie below her
metacentre.
However, the size of the GM determines
a ship’s seakeeping characteristics. If it is
too big, a large righting moment at small
angles of heel will make the ship “stiff” and
uncomfortable. Large accelerations can
affect safety and cause damage to
equipment and cargo. A smaller GM, on the
other hand, gives a small righting moment
which results in a “tender” ship — one
which rolls more slowly without excessive
accelerations.
Bulk carrier operators, therefore, like to
use the upper wing tanks (see diagram),
sometimes also known as upper hopper
tanks, for ballasting purposes because this
raises a ship’s centre of gravity and reduces
the GM. Traditionally, ballast water from
these large tanks is released directly
overboard without treatment. Now, the
treatment, pumping, piping and power
systems required to treat large volumes of
ballast to comply with the IMO’s Ballast
Water Convention discharge standard pose
a major economic and operational
challenge for ship operators.
The issue is further complicated by the
fact that most system technologies treat
ballast water as it is pumped on board. No
single system is completely effective,
however, and large bulk carriers deployed
on long-haul routes may be subject to “re-
growth” during a ballast voyage. This could
well mean that discharge standards at the
next loading port cannot be met.